Open
Conversation
43a5833 to
f7fcac0
Compare
f7fcac0 to
3161c60
Compare
3161c60 to
966efa8
Compare
strub
requested changes
Jan 10, 2026
966efa8 to
5fdfc42
Compare
88ed518 to
7a76e83
Compare
7a76e83 to
e73d4b6
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Another example for eHoare (done with @mzini). This example considers a nested loop which uniformly samples a boolean matrix of size$n \times m$ , and proves that the probably of sampling any boolean matrix of size $n \times m$ is no more than $2 ^ {- n \times m}$ .
My original purpose for this example was to figure out a game hopping in a big proof, but it turned out that this game hopping is not needed. But I think this is a good example for demonstrating how to do proof in eHoare.